@Dennis Bremner: thanks for the comments. The quarrying concept has been mentioned by a number of folks; the “pay as you go” model is apparently how this is done in Sri Lanka. How that might translate to a project in Quebec remains, of course, to be seen.

@Romeo D’Angela: good to hear from you. Yes, I am becoming familiar with Elcora Resources, and their Ragedara project in Sri Lanka. If your goal is to explore for new sources of Sri-Lankan-style graphite, then Sri Lanka is a good place to look!

@Amar Acharjee: as I mention in the article above, it will be a challenge for Canada Carbon to produce a mineral resource estimate, but not impossible. It remains to be seen how they approach it.

@pansy: I don’t disagree – establishing the quantity of material at the Miller site will be important going forward.

When we can get the mineral resource estimate of this Canada Carbon Miller project, which was the home of a historical graphite mine.

What seems to work for both the company and the shareholders is a quarrying concept and should facilitate an income while they expand. Sort of a pay as you go model.

Thanks again for covering this company. I know you must have many pounding on your door wanting you to visit. The fact you chose CCB is appreciated by the shareholders.

Getting your face on the map is tough nowadays thanks for the exposure.

One of the questions that comes to mind is how much flexibility do you think there is in the Quebec mining act to allow for a somehow quicker route to commercialization? I am thinking that with your REE separation project in Quebec, you might have some familiarity to the mining regulations (although your project is technological in nature and does not involve actual mining).