<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Afghan Lithium And Other Mineral Nonsense	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.techmetalsresearch.net/afghan-lithium-and-other-mineral-nonsense/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.techmetalsresearch.net/afghan-lithium-and-other-mineral-nonsense/</link>
	<description>Commentary &#38; analysis on rare earths and other technology metals</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 20:48:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Darron		</title>
		<link>https://www.techmetalsresearch.net/afghan-lithium-and-other-mineral-nonsense/#comment-1225</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Darron]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 20:48:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.techmetalsresearch.net/?p=1191#comment-1225</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hello Jack,

What about the latest we have read about companies, such as Lithium Exploration Group, developing lithium from groundwaters in South America and Alberta for a fraction of the cost of mining?

In other words, should we expect to see a Non-US lithium ETF anytime soon:)? Is this real? Does the world really need more lithium?

Thanks for any input from others as well.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Jack,</p>
<p>What about the latest we have read about companies, such as Lithium Exploration Group, developing lithium from groundwaters in South America and Alberta for a fraction of the cost of mining?</p>
<p>In other words, should we expect to see a Non-US lithium ETF anytime soon:)? Is this real? Does the world really need more lithium?</p>
<p>Thanks for any input from others as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Brian Penn		</title>
		<link>https://www.techmetalsresearch.net/afghan-lithium-and-other-mineral-nonsense/#comment-325</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Penn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jun 2010 22:25:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.techmetalsresearch.net/?p=1191#comment-325</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[You have the right idea. Obviously, infrastructure is critical. Rule of thumb for mining is 10. It takes $10 billion dollars and at least 10 years (if everything goes right) before you see the first shovel of ore for processing. This Afghanistan announcement was a PR stunt; nothing more.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have the right idea. Obviously, infrastructure is critical. Rule of thumb for mining is 10. It takes $10 billion dollars and at least 10 years (if everything goes right) before you see the first shovel of ore for processing. This Afghanistan announcement was a PR stunt; nothing more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jim Bond		</title>
		<link>https://www.techmetalsresearch.net/afghan-lithium-and-other-mineral-nonsense/#comment-324</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Bond]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 14:49:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.techmetalsresearch.net/?p=1191#comment-324</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Good article I wondered when some one would raise the points of infrastructure and operating cost deductions from gross value in the ground. The times writer is a mouth piece for somebody in Washington for sure, both parties seem very ignorant about mining reality; time and capital requirements. Note the Afgan government has now started to beat the drums in London and Toronto. I am sure that the promoters will jump all over the story: the US government has validated the fantastic opportunity I am making available to you Mr naive investor

I have now bookmarked this site; I got here via resource Investor link.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good article I wondered when some one would raise the points of infrastructure and operating cost deductions from gross value in the ground. The times writer is a mouth piece for somebody in Washington for sure, both parties seem very ignorant about mining reality; time and capital requirements. Note the Afgan government has now started to beat the drums in London and Toronto. I am sure that the promoters will jump all over the story: the US government has validated the fantastic opportunity I am making available to you Mr naive investor</p>
<p>I have now bookmarked this site; I got here via resource Investor link.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tek		</title>
		<link>https://www.techmetalsresearch.net/afghan-lithium-and-other-mineral-nonsense/#comment-323</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tek]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 16:29:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.techmetalsresearch.net/?p=1191#comment-323</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Jack, your third paragraph about drugs, war lords, and the completely regressive history of anything Western being incorporated into Afghanistan is exactly what I posted at RMB, just before reading this article.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jack, your third paragraph about drugs, war lords, and the completely regressive history of anything Western being incorporated into Afghanistan is exactly what I posted at RMB, just before reading this article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: QuarterChoke		</title>
		<link>https://www.techmetalsresearch.net/afghan-lithium-and-other-mineral-nonsense/#comment-322</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[QuarterChoke]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 04:04:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.techmetalsresearch.net/?p=1191#comment-322</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[And the Chinese development work will come at no direct cost to them. The U.S. will finance the whole deal, ad nauseum, with a half trillion dollars per year in interest payments on money we borrowed from them. Can’t you just feel the stimulus?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And the Chinese development work will come at no direct cost to them. The U.S. will finance the whole deal, ad nauseum, with a half trillion dollars per year in interest payments on money we borrowed from them. Can’t you just feel the stimulus?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jack Lifton		</title>
		<link>https://www.techmetalsresearch.net/afghan-lithium-and-other-mineral-nonsense/#comment-321</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jack Lifton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 03:13:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.techmetalsresearch.net/?p=1191#comment-321</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thaidiamond,

Re-read your sentence below:

“Re-read the first part of your diatriabe Jack. Where you detail the “logistics” that the development of natural resources requires. First off, “infrastructure” is the appropriate term.”

I am detailing the infrastructure by individual components, logistics, water, and power. I left out the need for skilled labor.

I work in China with Chinese companies in mining and refining, and I can tell you that the “infrastructure’ necessary for the Afghan copper project will be an extension of China’s infrastructure and will be of minimal use to the Afghanistan of today.

Investing in Afghan mining ventures created by western promoters is foolish in the extreme. The natural market for Afghan resources is China and India. China with its common border with Afghanistan is the natural and logical source for any Afghan resource development.

i don’t care if you believe me or not. Institutional investors have little or no interest in such far out high risk ventures unless a deep pockets end user with an agenda beyond profit such as a Chinese miner, refiner, or fabricator is involved. i am telling small investors to avoid the promotional hype sure to be following on this story.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thaidiamond,</p>
<p>Re-read your sentence below:</p>
<p>“Re-read the first part of your diatriabe Jack. Where you detail the “logistics” that the development of natural resources requires. First off, “infrastructure” is the appropriate term.”</p>
<p>I am detailing the infrastructure by individual components, logistics, water, and power. I left out the need for skilled labor.</p>
<p>I work in China with Chinese companies in mining and refining, and I can tell you that the “infrastructure’ necessary for the Afghan copper project will be an extension of China’s infrastructure and will be of minimal use to the Afghanistan of today.</p>
<p>Investing in Afghan mining ventures created by western promoters is foolish in the extreme. The natural market for Afghan resources is China and India. China with its common border with Afghanistan is the natural and logical source for any Afghan resource development.</p>
<p>i don’t care if you believe me or not. Institutional investors have little or no interest in such far out high risk ventures unless a deep pockets end user with an agenda beyond profit such as a Chinese miner, refiner, or fabricator is involved. i am telling small investors to avoid the promotional hype sure to be following on this story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Thaidiamond		</title>
		<link>https://www.techmetalsresearch.net/afghan-lithium-and-other-mineral-nonsense/#comment-320</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thaidiamond]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 02:52:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.techmetalsresearch.net/?p=1191#comment-320</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The NYT article didn’t imply all this mineral production was going to come on stream tomorrow—or even in ten or twenty years. It simply stated that there is potential to develop a viable economic resource over multiple decades.

You might want to get up to speed on the history of Chilean copper production and how valuable it’s has been to its economy. That too didn’t happen overnight. Or even a couple of decades.

Copper was the country’s top industry and export commodity through 2002, and, in 2000, copper accounted for 40.5% of export earnings, which, in turn, accounted for 25% of GDP.

The expansion of the copper sector and copper exports played a key role in Chile’s economic development.

Re-read the first part of your diatriabe Jack. Where you detail the “logistics” that the development of natural resources requires. First off, “infrastructure” is the appropriate term.

Then factor in that much of Chile’s copper comes from its Atacama desert region—the driest desert in the world. How dry? Average rainfall is 1 millimeter (0.04 in) per year.

Factor in its high altitude and the fact than none of the labor at some of the world’s biggest copper mines lived anywhere near such inhospitable regions. And just like mines, people too need infrastructure to live.

None of this existed in the Atacama.

Yes, it wasn’t done overnight. But it was accomplished and over time provided the support for Chile’s economic diversification.

And it was accomplished when demand was much lower. Not during an era when the single most important economic event in our life time will be the emerge of an Asian middle class—measure in billions, not millions as what the western world experience.

Will there be enough supply? Teck’s CEO Don Lindsay recently noted: “We think that over the next ten-year period if copper demand grows even at a moderate rate, that the mining industry will not be able to keep up.”

Perhaps that’s why the Chinese already building a copper mine in Afghanistan—in a place where they first have to develop almost of the requisite infrastructure.

They certainly don’t subscribe to your “mining ventures in remote places usually fail” mantra.

Indeed anyone with a sense of history can see how patently absurd that is. Just look at the American West. What infrastructure existed in 19th century Nevada, Utah and the second largest copper producing region on the planet—Arizona.

And today’s Afghanistan may have access to technology, new processes—and capital—the Earp brothers could only dream of.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The NYT article didn’t imply all this mineral production was going to come on stream tomorrow—or even in ten or twenty years. It simply stated that there is potential to develop a viable economic resource over multiple decades.</p>
<p>You might want to get up to speed on the history of Chilean copper production and how valuable it’s has been to its economy. That too didn’t happen overnight. Or even a couple of decades.</p>
<p>Copper was the country’s top industry and export commodity through 2002, and, in 2000, copper accounted for 40.5% of export earnings, which, in turn, accounted for 25% of GDP.</p>
<p>The expansion of the copper sector and copper exports played a key role in Chile’s economic development.</p>
<p>Re-read the first part of your diatriabe Jack. Where you detail the “logistics” that the development of natural resources requires. First off, “infrastructure” is the appropriate term.</p>
<p>Then factor in that much of Chile’s copper comes from its Atacama desert region—the driest desert in the world. How dry? Average rainfall is 1 millimeter (0.04 in) per year.</p>
<p>Factor in its high altitude and the fact than none of the labor at some of the world’s biggest copper mines lived anywhere near such inhospitable regions. And just like mines, people too need infrastructure to live.</p>
<p>None of this existed in the Atacama.</p>
<p>Yes, it wasn’t done overnight. But it was accomplished and over time provided the support for Chile’s economic diversification.</p>
<p>And it was accomplished when demand was much lower. Not during an era when the single most important economic event in our life time will be the emerge of an Asian middle class—measure in billions, not millions as what the western world experience.</p>
<p>Will there be enough supply? Teck’s CEO Don Lindsay recently noted: “We think that over the next ten-year period if copper demand grows even at a moderate rate, that the mining industry will not be able to keep up.”</p>
<p>Perhaps that’s why the Chinese already building a copper mine in Afghanistan—in a place where they first have to develop almost of the requisite infrastructure.</p>
<p>They certainly don’t subscribe to your “mining ventures in remote places usually fail” mantra.</p>
<p>Indeed anyone with a sense of history can see how patently absurd that is. Just look at the American West. What infrastructure existed in 19th century Nevada, Utah and the second largest copper producing region on the planet—Arizona.</p>
<p>And today’s Afghanistan may have access to technology, new processes—and capital—the Earp brothers could only dream of.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Chris		</title>
		<link>https://www.techmetalsresearch.net/afghan-lithium-and-other-mineral-nonsense/#comment-319</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 21:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.techmetalsresearch.net/?p=1191#comment-319</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I agree that the lithium “discovery” is hardly new and hardly worth they hype. Why didn’t the NYT release an article about the natural gas, diamonds and rubies locked up those mountains, or about the immense potential in tourism and skiing? If those Afghans ever get their stuff straight, they’ll have better slopes than the Swiss!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that the lithium “discovery” is hardly new and hardly worth they hype. Why didn’t the NYT release an article about the natural gas, diamonds and rubies locked up those mountains, or about the immense potential in tourism and skiing? If those Afghans ever get their stuff straight, they’ll have better slopes than the Swiss!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Aat Oskam		</title>
		<link>https://www.techmetalsresearch.net/afghan-lithium-and-other-mineral-nonsense/#comment-318</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aat Oskam]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 19:27:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.techmetalsresearch.net/?p=1191#comment-318</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Is doubleU still president?! Or is Dicky playing tricks? No Yammy Times anymore for the Aussies? Get Alive!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is doubleU still president?! Or is Dicky playing tricks? No Yammy Times anymore for the Aussies? Get Alive!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: John Petersen		</title>
		<link>https://www.techmetalsresearch.net/afghan-lithium-and-other-mineral-nonsense/#comment-317</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Petersen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 18:45:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.techmetalsresearch.net/?p=1191#comment-317</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[One of the big problems of our day is the conviction that if Steve Jobs can introduce an Ipad in January and book a couple billion in first year sales, then every industry can achieve comparable results.

The one great shock of the cleantech revolution will be that it takes decades to convert known resources in remote locations into producing mineral properties.

The shocks will be pretty unpleasant, but sooner or later folks will once again come to understand that mining and heavy manufacturing take an immense amount of time and money.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the big problems of our day is the conviction that if Steve Jobs can introduce an Ipad in January and book a couple billion in first year sales, then every industry can achieve comparable results.</p>
<p>The one great shock of the cleantech revolution will be that it takes decades to convert known resources in remote locations into producing mineral properties.</p>
<p>The shocks will be pretty unpleasant, but sooner or later folks will once again come to understand that mining and heavy manufacturing take an immense amount of time and money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 

Served from: www.techmetalsresearch.net @ 2024-01-23 06:57:57 by W3 Total Cache
-->