<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The Goldilocks Mining Principle: Right-Sizing Rare-Earth Mining Ventures	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.techmetalsresearch.net/the-goldilocks-mining-principle-right-sizing-rare-earth-mining-ventures-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.techmetalsresearch.net/the-goldilocks-mining-principle-right-sizing-rare-earth-mining-ventures-2/</link>
	<description>Commentary &#38; analysis on rare earths and other technology metals</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 13:02:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: T.Martin		</title>
		<link>https://www.techmetalsresearch.net/the-goldilocks-mining-principle-right-sizing-rare-earth-mining-ventures-2/#comment-632</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[T.Martin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 13:02:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.techmetalsresearch.net/?p=1670#comment-632</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I left this comment to Mr. Fulp:

I don&#039;t get paid by the companies listed above so I will turn negative on them to help the ones that pay me.

Mr. Fulp this should be your philosophy:

What&#039;s in for me and will they except my fees to be mentioned by me.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I left this comment to Mr. Fulp:</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t get paid by the companies listed above so I will turn negative on them to help the ones that pay me.</p>
<p>Mr. Fulp this should be your philosophy:</p>
<p>What&#8217;s in for me and will they except my fees to be mentioned by me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: BRUCE		</title>
		<link>https://www.techmetalsresearch.net/the-goldilocks-mining-principle-right-sizing-rare-earth-mining-ventures-2/#comment-629</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[BRUCE]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 13:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.techmetalsresearch.net/?p=1670#comment-629</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Dear Garth, thank you very much for all your reply and notes, there are really helping my investigation.
Here i have one concern:  Thorium
According to my knowledge, it is one of the rare earth metal,  and this mineral as a source of nuclear fuel it is claimed to produce less shorter half life waste. Be more difficult to use in nuclear weapons. More suitable then uranium as a fuel and more abundant in the earths crust.

and just wondering u have any idea which australian mining company is operating on this mineral? 
Cheers,
Best regards,
Bruce]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Garth, thank you very much for all your reply and notes, there are really helping my investigation.<br />
Here i have one concern:  Thorium<br />
According to my knowledge, it is one of the rare earth metal,  and this mineral as a source of nuclear fuel it is claimed to produce less shorter half life waste. Be more difficult to use in nuclear weapons. More suitable then uranium as a fuel and more abundant in the earths crust.</p>
<p>and just wondering u have any idea which australian mining company is operating on this mineral?<br />
Cheers,<br />
Best regards,<br />
Bruce</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: alex		</title>
		<link>https://www.techmetalsresearch.net/the-goldilocks-mining-principle-right-sizing-rare-earth-mining-ventures-2/#comment-609</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[alex]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 17:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.techmetalsresearch.net/?p=1670#comment-609</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[thank -you all for your response,the tailings in question is in brazil the taboca pitinga tin mine,does it apply here as well,and if we are talking about thorium what about gwg south africa mine,the government is interested in the thorium and it can be stock piled safely,can this not be applied elsewere as thorium could and should be tomorrows nuclear fuel, a question to all ,the election results for KYRGYZ should be positive for stans energy,could they not be next big player, with existing infrastructure and political ties]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thank -you all for your response,the tailings in question is in brazil the taboca pitinga tin mine,does it apply here as well,and if we are talking about thorium what about gwg south africa mine,the government is interested in the thorium and it can be stock piled safely,can this not be applied elsewere as thorium could and should be tomorrows nuclear fuel, a question to all ,the election results for KYRGYZ should be positive for stans energy,could they not be next big player, with existing infrastructure and political ties</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Greenfields		</title>
		<link>https://www.techmetalsresearch.net/the-goldilocks-mining-principle-right-sizing-rare-earth-mining-ventures-2/#comment-607</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greenfields]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Oct 2010 15:07:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.techmetalsresearch.net/?p=1670#comment-607</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Alex,

In response to your point about tin tailings, I assume you&#039;re referring to the alluvial tin deposits in places like Indonesia, Malaysia and Thailand, that have high levels of monazite.

I visited some of these operations earlier this year, primarily for tin research, but I did ask them about the stockpiles of rare earths in tailings and what the prospects for these where. They said they&#039;d already recieved a fair few enquiries about this over the years, but because the tailings are quite radioactive (due to the thorium in the monazite) the stockpiles are monitered by the Indonesian nuclear authorities, which aren&#039;t really keen on them being mined for a variety of environmental and security reasons. This is obviously quite a severe block to investment.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alex,</p>
<p>In response to your point about tin tailings, I assume you&#8217;re referring to the alluvial tin deposits in places like Indonesia, Malaysia and Thailand, that have high levels of monazite.</p>
<p>I visited some of these operations earlier this year, primarily for tin research, but I did ask them about the stockpiles of rare earths in tailings and what the prospects for these where. They said they&#8217;d already recieved a fair few enquiries about this over the years, but because the tailings are quite radioactive (due to the thorium in the monazite) the stockpiles are monitered by the Indonesian nuclear authorities, which aren&#8217;t really keen on them being mined for a variety of environmental and security reasons. This is obviously quite a severe block to investment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Greenfields		</title>
		<link>https://www.techmetalsresearch.net/the-goldilocks-mining-principle-right-sizing-rare-earth-mining-ventures-2/#comment-606</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greenfields]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Oct 2010 13:40:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.techmetalsresearch.net/?p=1670#comment-606</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Excellent article, very insightful. It also touches an issue effecting the wider mining industry as a whole - that of capital costs. For a variety of reasons capital costs are soaring and this is discouraging large miners from building new mines - instead they are focusing on marketing and extracting a greater share of metals prices, or buying other operating capacity and reducing operating costs, to once again increase their share of the metals prices. It is left to the junior sector to build new capacity, as this is the only realistic way of entering the industry.

For new mine capacity to be built, the downstream industry will have to help fund it, reducing effective capital costs at the mine stage, spreading the capital risk along the supply chain and making the mine investments more attractive. The issue is slightly different in rare earths as there is no existing mine capacity (outside China) to buy try and reduce the operating costs of, or to try and extract a greater share of the metal price. Also the mine stage receives less of the share of the final metal price, than say copper or steel (iron ore). As such the only way of entering the rare earth&#039;s mining industry is building new mine capacity - in a way the rare earths mining industry has reached this final stage, where there is no easy option left but to build risky new mine capacity, before other metal mining industries. 

Once mining investors realise this lack of options in rare earths mining they will invest elsewhere in the mining industry for a more certain return, either funding takeovers of existing mining capacity in another metal, with the aim of reducing operating costs or improving marketing strategies to extract a greater share of the metals price; or building new mine capacity in other metals where a greater share of the metal price is already received than in rare earth metals. 

As such if the downstream rare earths consuming industry wants to expand it needs to help fund the new rare earths mining capacity, reducing the effective capital cost at the rare earth mine stage and making the investment more attractive. Quite how the capital risk is spread along the supply chain is still open for debate (i.e. Jack&#039;s China and Japan models), but may end up blazing a trail for the rest of the metals mining industry.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent article, very insightful. It also touches an issue effecting the wider mining industry as a whole &#8211; that of capital costs. For a variety of reasons capital costs are soaring and this is discouraging large miners from building new mines &#8211; instead they are focusing on marketing and extracting a greater share of metals prices, or buying other operating capacity and reducing operating costs, to once again increase their share of the metals prices. It is left to the junior sector to build new capacity, as this is the only realistic way of entering the industry.</p>
<p>For new mine capacity to be built, the downstream industry will have to help fund it, reducing effective capital costs at the mine stage, spreading the capital risk along the supply chain and making the mine investments more attractive. The issue is slightly different in rare earths as there is no existing mine capacity (outside China) to buy try and reduce the operating costs of, or to try and extract a greater share of the metal price. Also the mine stage receives less of the share of the final metal price, than say copper or steel (iron ore). As such the only way of entering the rare earth&#8217;s mining industry is building new mine capacity &#8211; in a way the rare earths mining industry has reached this final stage, where there is no easy option left but to build risky new mine capacity, before other metal mining industries. </p>
<p>Once mining investors realise this lack of options in rare earths mining they will invest elsewhere in the mining industry for a more certain return, either funding takeovers of existing mining capacity in another metal, with the aim of reducing operating costs or improving marketing strategies to extract a greater share of the metals price; or building new mine capacity in other metals where a greater share of the metal price is already received than in rare earth metals. </p>
<p>As such if the downstream rare earths consuming industry wants to expand it needs to help fund the new rare earths mining capacity, reducing the effective capital cost at the rare earth mine stage and making the investment more attractive. Quite how the capital risk is spread along the supply chain is still open for debate (i.e. Jack&#8217;s China and Japan models), but may end up blazing a trail for the rest of the metals mining industry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Joseph Ghitis		</title>
		<link>https://www.techmetalsresearch.net/the-goldilocks-mining-principle-right-sizing-rare-earth-mining-ventures-2/#comment-605</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Ghitis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Oct 2010 13:26:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.techmetalsresearch.net/?p=1670#comment-605</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Any thoughts on end of supply chain companies like Neo Material Tech?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any thoughts on end of supply chain companies like Neo Material Tech?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Gareth Hatch		</title>
		<link>https://www.techmetalsresearch.net/the-goldilocks-mining-principle-right-sizing-rare-earth-mining-ventures-2/#comment-603</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gareth Hatch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 17:39:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.techmetalsresearch.net/?p=1670#comment-603</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thank you again folks, for your feedback and comments.

Barry Zern:  I hear what you&#039;re saying but I don&#039;t think you&#039;ll ever find the &quot;perfect&quot; project, be it in the rare earths space or elsewhere.

Graham Dillon: Lynas is building an &quot;Advanced Materials Plant&quot; in Malaysia to process their concentrates, and according to company presentations has a number of customers ready to buy the rare earth-based products from that facility in the future, once they&#039;re underway.

Gordon Clarke: At the end of the day, if in the future, domestic Chinese producers cannot meet internal demand, and if companies like Molycorp are willing to sell their products to Chinese customers, if they have the capacity to do so after meeting the needs of their other customers - I can see that happening, sure.

Alex: Your comment implies a bias that simply does not exist. As I said previously here, there are dozens upon dozens of other companies out there that we did not mention. FYI, when I discuss projects in this type of context, I generally [though not always] stick to those with mineral resources or reserves as defined by NI 43-101 or JORC, and / or that have historical data based on previous mining campaigns.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you again folks, for your feedback and comments.</p>
<p>Barry Zern:  I hear what you&#8217;re saying but I don&#8217;t think you&#8217;ll ever find the &#8220;perfect&#8221; project, be it in the rare earths space or elsewhere.</p>
<p>Graham Dillon: Lynas is building an &#8220;Advanced Materials Plant&#8221; in Malaysia to process their concentrates, and according to company presentations has a number of customers ready to buy the rare earth-based products from that facility in the future, once they&#8217;re underway.</p>
<p>Gordon Clarke: At the end of the day, if in the future, domestic Chinese producers cannot meet internal demand, and if companies like Molycorp are willing to sell their products to Chinese customers, if they have the capacity to do so after meeting the needs of their other customers &#8211; I can see that happening, sure.</p>
<p>Alex: Your comment implies a bias that simply does not exist. As I said previously here, there are dozens upon dozens of other companies out there that we did not mention. FYI, when I discuss projects in this type of context, I generally [though not always] stick to those with mineral resources or reserves as defined by NI 43-101 or JORC, and / or that have historical data based on previous mining campaigns.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: alex		</title>
		<link>https://www.techmetalsresearch.net/the-goldilocks-mining-principle-right-sizing-rare-earth-mining-ventures-2/#comment-602</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[alex]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 17:17:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.techmetalsresearch.net/?p=1670#comment-602</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[there is no talk of nem,with the prospect of mining rare earths from tin tailings that have high concentration of the two in most demand,why is there no mention of them,is it because it could be the lowest cost producer,making all other ventures less likely to suceed]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>there is no talk of nem,with the prospect of mining rare earths from tin tailings that have high concentration of the two in most demand,why is there no mention of them,is it because it could be the lowest cost producer,making all other ventures less likely to suceed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Chris		</title>
		<link>https://www.techmetalsresearch.net/the-goldilocks-mining-principle-right-sizing-rare-earth-mining-ventures-2/#comment-601</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 14:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.techmetalsresearch.net/?p=1670#comment-601</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Brad, no problem. yes, an r/s CAN be a kiss but it also depends. Actualy I think GWG even talked about that in their filing.

Basically if it&#039;s simply for no reason, &quot;kiss&quot;.

But i was just replyin with what the company has said at this point about 330m. And i see they filed to issue another 100M.

So...???

Chris]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brad, no problem. yes, an r/s CAN be a kiss but it also depends. Actualy I think GWG even talked about that in their filing.</p>
<p>Basically if it&#8217;s simply for no reason, &#8220;kiss&#8221;.</p>
<p>But i was just replyin with what the company has said at this point about 330m. And i see they filed to issue another 100M.</p>
<p>So&#8230;???</p>
<p>Chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Brad		</title>
		<link>https://www.techmetalsresearch.net/the-goldilocks-mining-principle-right-sizing-rare-earth-mining-ventures-2/#comment-600</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brad]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 10:36:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.techmetalsresearch.net/?p=1670#comment-600</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Garth - thanks for the reply all noted and will do the &quot;next&quot; level of investigation.

Chris - thanks for the information, however reverse splits are usually the kiss of death, not saying that this will be the case for GWG, however the landscape is littered with mining companies that have travelled down this road only to prolong their demise...again not saying that this will be the case with GWG, just offering practical experience and pass knowledge....good luck with GWG if you own it.

Brad]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Garth &#8211; thanks for the reply all noted and will do the &#8220;next&#8221; level of investigation.</p>
<p>Chris &#8211; thanks for the information, however reverse splits are usually the kiss of death, not saying that this will be the case for GWG, however the landscape is littered with mining companies that have travelled down this road only to prolong their demise&#8230;again not saying that this will be the case with GWG, just offering practical experience and pass knowledge&#8230;.good luck with GWG if you own it.</p>
<p>Brad</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 

Served from: www.techmetalsresearch.net @ 2024-03-22 02:02:36 by W3 Total Cache
-->