<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The Issue of Residual Thorium &#038; Uranium From Rare-Earth Ore Processing	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.techmetalsresearch.net/the-issue-of-residual-thorium-uranium-from-rare-earth-ore-processing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.techmetalsresearch.net/the-issue-of-residual-thorium-uranium-from-rare-earth-ore-processing/</link>
	<description>Commentary &#38; analysis on rare earths and other technology metals</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 May 2011 07:12:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Nasdram		</title>
		<link>https://www.techmetalsresearch.net/the-issue-of-residual-thorium-uranium-from-rare-earth-ore-processing/#comment-1260</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nasdram]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 May 2011 07:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.techmetalsresearch.net/?p=3538#comment-1260</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[@Carlton:

I doubt that a CANDU reactor can use neodymium as a fuel as it is neither fissile nor fertile. But it is very likely that it is used in some form of magnet somewhere in the reactor.

AS for producing, every single nuclear power plant produces neodymium as it is a fissile product. But so far i&#039;m not aware of a single reactor world wide that separates spent fuel for something else than plutonium. Before it will be economical to separate out the neodymium other fissile products will be done most likely as Xenon for example is easier to extract.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Carlton:</p>
<p>I doubt that a CANDU reactor can use neodymium as a fuel as it is neither fissile nor fertile. But it is very likely that it is used in some form of magnet somewhere in the reactor.</p>
<p>AS for producing, every single nuclear power plant produces neodymium as it is a fissile product. But so far i&#8217;m not aware of a single reactor world wide that separates spent fuel for something else than plutonium. Before it will be economical to separate out the neodymium other fissile products will be done most likely as Xenon for example is easier to extract.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: D. Carlton Rossi		</title>
		<link>https://www.techmetalsresearch.net/the-issue-of-residual-thorium-uranium-from-rare-earth-ore-processing/#comment-1254</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[D. Carlton Rossi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 May 2011 20:39:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.techmetalsresearch.net/?p=3538#comment-1254</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Dear Mr. Layton

I happened to be doing some research into thorium and neodymium.  I read somewhere I believe that a CANDU thorium reactor uses neodymium and also produces it.  Does that sound correct?  If true, what would be the figures for a large scale project?  Thanking you in advance.  

D. Carlton Rossi]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Mr. Layton</p>
<p>I happened to be doing some research into thorium and neodymium.  I read somewhere I believe that a CANDU thorium reactor uses neodymium and also produces it.  Does that sound correct?  If true, what would be the figures for a large scale project?  Thanking you in advance.  </p>
<p>D. Carlton Rossi</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jack Lifton		</title>
		<link>https://www.techmetalsresearch.net/the-issue-of-residual-thorium-uranium-from-rare-earth-ore-processing/#comment-1095</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jack Lifton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2011 19:07:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.techmetalsresearch.net/?p=3538#comment-1095</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[James,

This issue will also add to the cost of developing a REEs mine. A small problem in a tough jurisdiction with strict regulations and enforcement can also mean delays through litigation by private parties in some countries.  

Jack]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James,</p>
<p>This issue will also add to the cost of developing a REEs mine. A small problem in a tough jurisdiction with strict regulations and enforcement can also mean delays through litigation by private parties in some countries.  </p>
<p>Jack</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: James		</title>
		<link>https://www.techmetalsresearch.net/the-issue-of-residual-thorium-uranium-from-rare-earth-ore-processing/#comment-1093</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2011 16:34:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.techmetalsresearch.net/?p=3538#comment-1093</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi Jack,

I&#039;m glad this issue is finally being addressed by rare earth industry representatives, as thorium/uranium storage and processing has not been addressed by many analysts or companies.

I have been reading a booklet by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) titled, &quot;Communications on nuclear, radiation, transport and waste safety; a practical handbook&quot; in order to better address investor questions on this issue of radioactive storage and processing.  It&#039;s a bit of a dry read, but I highly recommend any serious RE investor to read something like this before making their investments.  I think we can all agree, there will be multiple properties around the world that will get permitted due to radioactivity.  Additionally, best practice control mechanisms will need to be thoroughly tested before any scaled production can take place.  Unfortunately for the RE sector, this is going to add to the timeframe to reach production.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jack,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m glad this issue is finally being addressed by rare earth industry representatives, as thorium/uranium storage and processing has not been addressed by many analysts or companies.</p>
<p>I have been reading a booklet by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) titled, &#8220;Communications on nuclear, radiation, transport and waste safety; a practical handbook&#8221; in order to better address investor questions on this issue of radioactive storage and processing.  It&#8217;s a bit of a dry read, but I highly recommend any serious RE investor to read something like this before making their investments.  I think we can all agree, there will be multiple properties around the world that will get permitted due to radioactivity.  Additionally, best practice control mechanisms will need to be thoroughly tested before any scaled production can take place.  Unfortunately for the RE sector, this is going to add to the timeframe to reach production.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Russell Starr		</title>
		<link>https://www.techmetalsresearch.net/the-issue-of-residual-thorium-uranium-from-rare-earth-ore-processing/#comment-1091</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Russell Starr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2011 12:45:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.techmetalsresearch.net/?p=3538#comment-1091</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Sorry what I should have said was &quot;150km away from GWG close to the Namibian border&quot; apologies]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry what I should have said was &#8220;150km away from GWG close to the Namibian border&#8221; apologies</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Russell Starr		</title>
		<link>https://www.techmetalsresearch.net/the-issue-of-residual-thorium-uranium-from-rare-earth-ore-processing/#comment-1090</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Russell Starr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2011 12:43:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.techmetalsresearch.net/?p=3538#comment-1090</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Jack, how correct you are. It should also be mentioned that the only non-Chinese, near-term producer with a thorium storage permit is GWG - Great West. Ironically, another company not 150km away from them in Namibia, has a very similar market cap, lower grades, and NO thorium storage permit. 
I too believe the market will eventually view thorium as potentially a positive by-product, but at this juncture, it is not the case. Hence one had better do their due diligence and look for locations either with thorium/uranium permits or in a nuclear friendly jurisdiction.
Hope all is well Jack - likewise to Gareth]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jack, how correct you are. It should also be mentioned that the only non-Chinese, near-term producer with a thorium storage permit is GWG &#8211; Great West. Ironically, another company not 150km away from them in Namibia, has a very similar market cap, lower grades, and NO thorium storage permit.<br />
I too believe the market will eventually view thorium as potentially a positive by-product, but at this juncture, it is not the case. Hence one had better do their due diligence and look for locations either with thorium/uranium permits or in a nuclear friendly jurisdiction.<br />
Hope all is well Jack &#8211; likewise to Gareth</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mike		</title>
		<link>https://www.techmetalsresearch.net/the-issue-of-residual-thorium-uranium-from-rare-earth-ore-processing/#comment-1088</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2011 06:48:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.techmetalsresearch.net/?p=3538#comment-1088</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi Jack
Thanks for a most informative article, but I believe that you have only scratched the surface of the thorium &quot;gorilla&quot;. There is much more to come, as we see presently with the Lynas plant in Malaysia not (yet) being awarded an operating licence because of radioactive fears in Malaysia, and that Lynas have been remarkable coy about down-playing (= not mentioning) the radioactivity of their ore concentrates into Malaysia.
IF you are correct that &quot;thorium is going to be an asset, not a liability&quot;, what sort of time frame are you loking at for this? 
And, if this is so, who are the buyers of thorium oxide or hydroxide out there? A list of these companies would be useful info.
Regards
Mike]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jack<br />
Thanks for a most informative article, but I believe that you have only scratched the surface of the thorium &#8220;gorilla&#8221;. There is much more to come, as we see presently with the Lynas plant in Malaysia not (yet) being awarded an operating licence because of radioactive fears in Malaysia, and that Lynas have been remarkable coy about down-playing (= not mentioning) the radioactivity of their ore concentrates into Malaysia.<br />
IF you are correct that &#8220;thorium is going to be an asset, not a liability&#8221;, what sort of time frame are you loking at for this?<br />
And, if this is so, who are the buyers of thorium oxide or hydroxide out there? A list of these companies would be useful info.<br />
Regards<br />
Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jim Bond		</title>
		<link>https://www.techmetalsresearch.net/the-issue-of-residual-thorium-uranium-from-rare-earth-ore-processing/#comment-1083</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Bond]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Mar 2011 22:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.techmetalsresearch.net/?p=3538#comment-1083</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi Jack:

As always very good insight and comment. I thought that Great Western had already been granted their thorium storage permit by South Africa? I will reseach this next week.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jack:</p>
<p>As always very good insight and comment. I thought that Great Western had already been granted their thorium storage permit by South Africa? I will reseach this next week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ruediger Haberland		</title>
		<link>https://www.techmetalsresearch.net/the-issue-of-residual-thorium-uranium-from-rare-earth-ore-processing/#comment-1082</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ruediger Haberland]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Mar 2011 21:54:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.techmetalsresearch.net/?p=3538#comment-1082</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The nuclear problems in Japan will bring us to the conclusion that the power plants from all the big companies are not inherently safe but can and will be upgraded:
Why not passive cooling (after-heat only) in case of an accident?
Water to be stored ontop of the reactor and released by heat or pressure activated diaphragms? 
Why not adopting the technology from any modern cars battery that caltalytically reburns hydrogen with oxygen to prevent overpressure? 
Some of the existing coal- or oil-fired-power-plants will be refurbished to burn gas  cheap now because of shale-gas and rising transport capacity for LNG.
Maybe also reinventing the Canadian CANDU and its seedlings (by the big four) that is much safer but might have suffered damage from.such a big earthquale too.
Anybody sincerely interested in this should dig the proceedings of the ICENES biannual conferences. (International conference on emerging nuclear power systems).
So after some years of hesitation (i assume) that building new reactors will happen once more. If conventional type then needing a lot more Uranium compared to heavy water moderated CANDU type. Conventional reactors need 3.5% enrichment and don&#039;t burn thorium or radioctive (high-activity) waste. CANDU type needs only 1.5% enrichment and can burn thorium and the bad part of radioactive waste (if separated  from the fission products) Enrichment is much more costly then the orignal natural uranium.
Back to rare earths: the stored thorium and the byproduct uranium will naturally dampen the up-going price excursions.
Workers in uranium mines were allowed 1mg intake per year - I don&#039;t know if this figure is still valid.
This is similar to allowed uranium in drinking water recently discussed in Europe and set now to 10µg per liter  - much too much for my thinking. 
Dust prevention in REE mines will need a lot of water and closed crushing and grinding facilities. Not a big problem today except maybe deep in some deserts and for low grade deposits.
RHABE]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The nuclear problems in Japan will bring us to the conclusion that the power plants from all the big companies are not inherently safe but can and will be upgraded:<br />
Why not passive cooling (after-heat only) in case of an accident?<br />
Water to be stored ontop of the reactor and released by heat or pressure activated diaphragms?<br />
Why not adopting the technology from any modern cars battery that caltalytically reburns hydrogen with oxygen to prevent overpressure?<br />
Some of the existing coal- or oil-fired-power-plants will be refurbished to burn gas  cheap now because of shale-gas and rising transport capacity for LNG.<br />
Maybe also reinventing the Canadian CANDU and its seedlings (by the big four) that is much safer but might have suffered damage from.such a big earthquale too.<br />
Anybody sincerely interested in this should dig the proceedings of the ICENES biannual conferences. (International conference on emerging nuclear power systems).<br />
So after some years of hesitation (i assume) that building new reactors will happen once more. If conventional type then needing a lot more Uranium compared to heavy water moderated CANDU type. Conventional reactors need 3.5% enrichment and don&#8217;t burn thorium or radioctive (high-activity) waste. CANDU type needs only 1.5% enrichment and can burn thorium and the bad part of radioactive waste (if separated  from the fission products) Enrichment is much more costly then the orignal natural uranium.<br />
Back to rare earths: the stored thorium and the byproduct uranium will naturally dampen the up-going price excursions.<br />
Workers in uranium mines were allowed 1mg intake per year &#8211; I don&#8217;t know if this figure is still valid.<br />
This is similar to allowed uranium in drinking water recently discussed in Europe and set now to 10µg per liter  &#8211; much too much for my thinking.<br />
Dust prevention in REE mines will need a lot of water and closed crushing and grinding facilities. Not a big problem today except maybe deep in some deserts and for low grade deposits.<br />
RHABE</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ron Coleman		</title>
		<link>https://www.techmetalsresearch.net/the-issue-of-residual-thorium-uranium-from-rare-earth-ore-processing/#comment-1073</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ron Coleman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Mar 2011 17:48:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.techmetalsresearch.net/?p=3538#comment-1073</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The nuclear disaster unfolding in Japan will have long-term effects on the prices of uranium--the commodity, the miners, and the construction industry. What impact will it have on the rare earth subsector?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The nuclear disaster unfolding in Japan will have long-term effects on the prices of uranium&#8211;the commodity, the miners, and the construction industry. What impact will it have on the rare earth subsector?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 

Served from: www.techmetalsresearch.net @ 2024-01-13 15:23:58 by W3 Total Cache
-->