Home » Rare Earths, Tools & Metrics » February 2011 Updates To the TMR Advanced Rare-Earth Projects Index

February 2011 Updates To the TMR Advanced Rare-Earth Projects Index

by Gareth Hatch on February 19, 2011 · 2 comments

in Rare Earths, Tools & Metrics

Bookmark and Share

I’ve recently made some updates to the metrics that make up the TMR Advanced Rare-Earth Projects Index. Specifically:

  • Elemental composition data for Cummins Range has been updated to reflect updated data requested and received from its operator;
  • The data for Mountain Pass was switched from Proven & Probable mineral reserves, to 43-101-compliant Measured, Indicated and Inferred mineral resource estimates, to allow for better comparisons with the other projects in the Index;
  • The data for Nechalacho / Thor Lake was updated to reflect a recently published increased resource estimate, a switch from mineral reserve to mineral resource data, and to include both the Upper and Basal Zones for the project;
  • The data for Steenkampskraal was updated to reflect some of the detail in a recent SRK report which was published on the project;
  • An updated resource estimate was published recently for Zeus / Kipawa, so this data set has been updated;
  • The values for the in-situ TREO and basket price metrics were updated for all projects.

That’s it for now. We’ll keep you posted of other updates as we make them.

Bookmark and Share

About Gareth Hatch

For more than 20 years, Gareth Hatch has helped people and organizations to better understand the challenges of the critical-materials supply chain. He is Managing Director of Strategic Materials Advisors and was a co-founder of Technology Metals Research, consulting firms operating in the critical-materials sector. Gareth is co-founder and CEO of Innovations Metals Corp. (IMC), developers of the proprietary RapidSX™ separation and purification process for critical metals. IMC is owned by Ucore Rare Metals Inc. (TSX.V:UCU) for whom he serves as CTO and Director. The views and opinions expressed by Gareth on this archived Web site are his alone. Such views and opinions do not necessarily represent those of any other person or entity.

1 Alexander February 20, 2011 at 4:18 AM

Good Morning,

In the last version from january, Jack was long in GWG. Right now he is not. Want he be more objective or why ? I ask you, as a GWG Investor. Thanks.

2 Don Olson February 24, 2011 at 5:15 PM

With the highest score going to Stans Energy in your latest update of your Value Index, how do you rate Stans as a potential buy at this time.
Thanks

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: