Perspectives On The Low Pricing Of The Rare Earths In The Chinese Domestic Market

by Jack Lifton on February 26, 2011 · 5 comments

in China, News Analysis, Rare Earths

Bookmark and Share

Today’s Wall Street Journal has an article titled “External Surpluses Root Cause of China’s Inflation Problem.” It is a report of a talk given yesterday by Mr. Yi Gang, vice-governor of the People’s Bank of China.

The talk included the following comments:

“In addition to boosting the flexibility of the yuan exchange rate, China also should adjust resource prices to address imbalances,” he said, “as many resources are still traded in China at below their natural prices. China also should boost wages and social benefits to lift consumption, step up its enforcement of environment regulations and undertake other structural reforms to address imbalances.”

(emphasis added by me).

Repeat after me: The selling prices of the rare earths and other commodities within China are still too low. Thus, if the Chinese government did not strictly control their export, then the market would drive all of the supply out of China chasing the higher prices in the foreign marketplace. One current driver for such a foreign accumulation would be the stocking of strategic materials (stockpiling) by governments, to protect their domestic industry’s security of supply. Another driver could well be inventory building, by “once-burned, twice-shy” private corporations, finally reversing the 50-year reign of the just-in-time / no-inventory philosophy , which was a principal driver in the creation of this problem.

Chinese central-planning economists however also see this danger to Chinese industrial security of supply, and by extension as potentially then leading to high unemployment in the very important domestic Chinese alternate energy, green and clean-tech sectors.

The Chinese central bank, the Peoples’ Bank of China (PBOC) does not want to buy commodities as an alternative to US Treasury bonds, because this could disrupt the commodities market causing price volatility in the very asset they are trying to use to stabilize prices and the currency. Even more important, no commodity accumulation of sufficient size to soak up excess Chinese liquidity, would likely make a dent in reserves as large as those of China in any case, but it would certainly interrupt the flow of raw materials for industry.

The PBOC is determined to force China to grow its consumer sector without causing inflation, one of two of the PBOC’s greatest fears. The other is a massively corrected and thus much more-expensive yuan. Yet, by continuing to buy up surplus and hot money inflow dollars at a fixed rate, it feeds, and it knows it is feeding, inflation, and increasing the pressure on it to revalue the yuan or let it float.

The prices of the rare earths in China will have to increase soon or smuggling will become uncontrollable. That is human nature. In the long run the production of the rare-earth metals outside of China will help the Chinese by increasing the global supply and reducing global prices and thus eliminating the need for export controls. This is doubly true when one considers that China itself is the world’s biggest market for rare-earth metals, and its neighbor Japan, accounts for most of the rest of the global demand.

The rare-earth-mining economy within China is tiny as a proportion of the GDP, but the number of jobs dependent critically on the properties of the rare-earth metals required to manufacture green and clean tech, as well as communication and entertainment technologies, is not trivial. China’s central planning dilemma is that it must keep rare earths cheap, in order not to drive rare-earth-based component jobs off-shore, to lower cost countries such as Vietnam or India. Its own entrepreneurs are already doing this, by the way.

The result for junior miners with rare-earth claims, is that the race is on to produce more of what China needs to be produced outside of China, to relieve the pressure on its two-tier pricing economy for commodities such as the rare earths.

The Chinese government maintains strict overall control of China’s economy from Beijing. Chinese businessmen, however, have the same mindset as any other businessmen: maximize profit and reduce costs. In today’s China, the government wins and it may use a meat ax rather than a scalpel to enforce its decisions such as with the rare earths recently.

To think though that Chinese economists and central bankers do not see the problem is foolish.

I believe that the selling prices outside of China of the rare earths will continue to rise, until there is significant non-Chinese production of the rare earths. Then if supply exceeds demand, which I think likely, there will be a massive culling of those companies not in production, or of those that are too large, or too skewed to light rare earths. The prices of the heavy rare earths, so long as China continues to maintain that its supplies are being exhausted, must continue to climb. One respected analyst is calling for a dysprosium price of nearly $2,000/kg by 2020. If China does not find domestic new supplies of dysprosium I think the analyst is on the right track.

Be cautious when investing in the rare-earth sector. Very large forces are intersecting in it, and will make it very volatile in the near term.

Bookmark and Share
1 Lou Stouch February 26, 2011 at 5:33 PM

Todays WSJ also had the largest insider transactions for the week. Four Molycorp execs sold $1.2 billion in stock on Feb 16th.

That doesnt sound to me like guys that think the price of RE’s is going up, unless they own tons more stock.

I have not researched that, but would love to hear if anyone knows.

2 Ron Coleman February 26, 2011 at 7:06 PM

Compare the market cap of MCP and Lynas, $4 billion and 3.2 B respectively, with that of Great Western and Stans, about $300 million each, and Ucore, 146 million. MCP’s valuation is absurd, since they don’t yet have any production to sell.

3 markco February 27, 2011 at 6:27 AM

Ron, the question is “Who will be the forerunner to production first?”

Lynas will be first out of the blocks commencing production end of third quarter or just over 6 months from now if everythiing goes to plan with LAMP.
Contracts in place.

Excellent opportunity to expand its resource.

Very few have mentioned the Duncans Deposit being HREE.

Then of course there is a 10% investment in NTU.AX made up of HREE.

In this game, to be first is what counts.

Everyone else has got to play catch-up.

That puts Lynas streets ahead of Molycorp.

IMO, Lynas is undervalued with Molycorp being overvalued.

Cheers markco2

4 Nick Outram February 27, 2011 at 2:06 PM

The share prices of these companies appear in proportion to their anticipated future production rates. MCP:20>40K, Lynas:10>20K, GWM: 3>5K.
Lynas will be first and so will be able to show massive positive cash flow, shortly followed by MCP. GWM is not far behind and has probably the best heavy-REE deposit going and it also already has the facilites to process the raw oxides into REEs. In short GWM looks undervalued to me, I know Jack bought a tonne a while back… :o)

5 Rick Krementz March 2, 2011 at 5:03 PM

Marko, “first out of the blocks” doesn’t really matter. None of the newer producers are going to flood the market and drive down prices. All-in cost per ton, total economic reserves, and relative proportion of heavy vs light elements (plus access to enough capital to make it happen) are the critical factors.

There is no first market advantage; these are commodities, not electronic gizmos.

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: